Your browser is out of date
With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.
1. Outflow: The Evolut™ FX+ TAV is designed with the same structural strength at the outflow as the Evolut™ FX valve.1
2. Inflow: The Evolut™ FX+ TAV is designed with the same radial force at the inflow as the Evolut™ FX valve.1
Built on the original CoreValve™ platform, Evolut™ FX+ is engineered with specific design elements to promote sustained valve performance with consistently large effective orifice area (EOAs) and low gradients over time. Evolut™ FX+ also uses the same Evolut™ FX delivery system designed for precision, flexibility, and control.
3. Waist: The Evolut™ FX+ TAV is designed with three windows that are 4x larger to enable lifetime management solutions such as coronary access.2
Tang, et al., found the commissural alignment technique allows for more accurate placement and orienting the hat marker at the outer core during deployment reduces incidence of severe coronary overlap.4
Using the valve radiopaque markers sustained from the Evolut™ FX system features, and following Evolut™ procedural technique, commissure alignment can be achieved.5
The Evolut™ FX+ windows are predicted to be aligned to the coronary ostias when following commissure alignment techniques.2
Tang, et al., found the commissural alignment technique allows for more accurate placement and orienting the hat marker at the outer core during deployment reduces incidence of severe coronary overlap.4
Using the valve radiopaque markers sustained from the Evolut™ FX system features, and following Evolut™ procedural technique, commissure alignment can be achieved.5
The Evolut™ FX+ windows are predicted to be aligned to the coronary ostias when following commissure alignment techniques.2
4x less
bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD)† at 1 year vs. SAPIEN™* platform.‡ p < 0.001
Evolut™ TAVI: 9.4%
SAPIEN™* TAVI: 41.6%
N = 716 total
N = 355 Evolut™ TAVI
N= 361 SAPIEN™* TAVI
Evolut™ PRO+ 78.0%
Evolut™ PRO 17.1%
Evolut™ FX 4.3%
Evolut™ R 0.6%
SAPIEN™* 3 Ultra 80.8%
SAPIEN™* 3 19.2%
Clinical outcome composite
All-cause mortality, disabling stroke, or heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year
Difference, -1.2% (90% CI -4.9%, 2.5%), p < 0.001 for noninferiority Hazard ratio, 0.90 (95% CI 0.56–1.43)
† Valve performance as defined as freedom from BVD at 12 months. BVD is a composite including any of the following: hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction (mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg), non-structural valve dysfunction (severe PPM or ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation), thrombosis, endocarditis, and aortic valve reintervention.
‡ In patients with small annuli (area ≤ 430 mm2) in all-comers trial, consisting of majority low surgical risk participants (52.1%).
Performance as compared to Evolut™ PRO+ and FX system in bench testing. Bench testing may not be indicative of clinical performance. Medtronic data on file. Evolut™ FX+ Test Reports: D01073856, D01095344, D01084996.
Medtronic computational data model on file compared to the Evolut™ platform. Bench top computational model may not be indicative of clinical performance. Evolut™ FX+ Test Report: DO1106198 Rev. A.
Tarantini G, Fovino LN, Scotti A, et al. Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with commissural alignment: The ALIGN-ACCESS Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(2):e011045. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011045.
Tang GHL, Sengupta A, Alexis SL, et al. Conventional versus modified delivery system technique in commissural alignment from the Evolut low-risk CT substudy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;99(3):924-931. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29973.
Attizzani G, Gabasha S, Filby S. TCT-248 Assessment of coronary cannulation, commissure and coronary alignment post-TAVR with the new supra-annular, self-expanding Evolut™ FX system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(17):B97. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.255
Herrmann HC, Mehran R, Blackman DJ, et al. Self-expanding or balloon-expandable TAVR in patients with a small aortic Annulus. N Engl J Med. Published online April 7, 2024. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312573.
Reardon M, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients at low surgical risk: 4-year outcomes from the Evolut low risk trial. Presented at TCT; 2023.
Reardon et al. 5-Year Incidence, Timing and Predictors of Structural Valve Deterioration of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Insights from the CoreValve US Pivotal and SURTAVI Trials. Presented at ACC 2022. Updated data on file.
DISCLAIMER
The material on this website should not be considered the exclusive source of information, it does not replace or supersede information contained in the device manual(s). Please note that the intended use of a product may vary depending on geographical approvals.
See the device manual(s) for detailed information regarding the intended use, the implant procedure, indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and potential adverse events.
For a MRI compatible device(s), consult the MRI information in the device manual(s) before performing a MRI. If a device is eligible for eIFU usage, instructions for use can be found at Medtronic’s website manuals.medtronic.com. Manuals can be viewed using a current version of any major internet browser. For best results, use Adobe Acrobat® Reader with the browser.
Medtronic products placed on European markets bear the CE mark and the UKCA mark (if applicable). For any further information, contact your local Medtronic representative.
© 2024 Medtronic. All rights reserved, Medtronic, Medtronic logo and Further, Together are trademarks of Medtronic.
™*Third party brands are trademarks of their respective owners. All other brands are trademarks of a Medtronic company.