Aurora EV-ICDTM  System

Aurora EV-ICD

Extravascular advantages

Aurora EV-ICDTM offers the advantages of an extravascular system while also providing ATP and Pause Prevention pacing in a device the same size as transvenous ICDs.

Aurora EV-ICD

Transvenous benefits

icon

Antitachycardia pacing (ATP)

The only extravascular ICD to offer ATP in studies of transvenous ICDs, even with extended detection intervals. ATP was associated with a 50% reduction in potentially unnecessary shock1-3 ,70% ATP-terminated episode success rate through an average10.6-month follow-up, avoiding 33 shocks in 7 patients.4

icon

Longevity

11.7 years projected longevity5 which is similar to other Medtronic single chamber ICDs. Greater longevity can reduce number of replacements and associated procedure risks.

icon

Pause prevention

A pacing feature that monitors the heart for significant pauses and responds by providing temporary bradycardia pacing supports. 

icon

Size and PhysioCurveTM design 

Minimizes tissue pressure and promote patient comfort6.

Clinical data

Medtronic EV ICD Pivotal Study

Primary results†4

Effectively terminated life-threatening rhythms with ATP and shocks while safely outside the vascular space.

Safe procedure

Primary safety objective met, 92.6% patients free from major system– or procedure–related complications at six months.*

Effective defibrillation

Primary efficacy objective met, 98.7% defibrillation success rate at implant,100% conversion of discrete spontaneous episodes.§

Successful ATP

70% of episodes successfully terminated, avoiding 33 shocks in seven patients7 (through 10.6 months average follow-up).

Long-term results†8

EV ICD demonstrated high ATP success and effective defibrillation in a single device while safely outside the vascular space.

Successful ATP with 77% of episodes terminated.||

Shock was avoided in nearly half of all VT/VF episodes due to ATP.||

  • ATP utilization increased significantly through the duration of follow-up (p < 0.0001).
  • No patient with successful ATP had therapy programmed off subsequently.

    Shock treated = 44 episodes

    ATP treated and shock avoided = 38 episodes

Safe procedure, safe system†8
  • No major intraprocedural complications.
  • No unique major complications observed related to the EV ICD procedure or system.
  • No reports of mediastinitis, sepsis or endocarditis related to EV ICD.
  • Thirty-one system or procedure related major complications occurred in 29 patients throughout the study. Of these, the most common were revision for lead dislodgement and treatment for postoperative wound or pocket infection.
Medtronic Academy

Educational resources on Medtronic Academy

Access interactive courses, videos, and educational resources to extend your learning on Aurora.

Contact us

Stay tuned on Aurora EV-ICD™ news

*Indicates Required Field

Your information will be processed and protected in accordance with our privacy statement

Selecting “no” to marketing emails above will not affect your other email selections, and a Medtronic representative will still reach out via email, if selected. Your personal data will used to manage your relationship with Medtronic, and, if you consent, to provide you with relevant email updates based on your user preferences. You can opt-out of receiving such emails at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the relevant email. Medtronic may use pixels and other technologies in emails to gather statistics around email opening and clicks, to help us improve our communications and to provide you with relevant content. For more information, see the Medtronic privacy notice.

You can always change your preferences or update your personal details by visiting the Preference center.

See the Preference center

Footnotes

*

Kaplan-Meier estimate

Through an average 10.6-month follow-up

The Aurora EV-ICD lead is not intended for implantation within the heart or vasculature, and, thus, Aurora is expected to avoid vascular complications associated with transvenous leads. There were no major intraprocedural complications observed in the EV ICD Pivotal Clinical study(4)

§

Discrete episodes are defined as less than or equal to two events within 24 hours.

||

Follow-up duration is an average of 30.6 months for the n = 299 patients with a successful implant.

Based on a paired statistical test comparing prehospital discharge to last available follow-up.

References

1

Arenal A, Proclemer A, Kloppe A, et al. Different impact of long-detection interval and anti-tachycardia pacing in reducing unnecessary shocks: data from the ADVANCE III trial. Europace. November 2016;18(11):1719-1725.

2

Lee S, Stern R, Wathen M, et al. Anti-Tachycardia Pacing Therapy Effectively Terminates Fast Ventricular Tachycardia after Longer Detection Duration in Primary Prevention Patients: Results from the PREPARE Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(5);S334-S356.

3

Brown ML, Gerritse B, Kurita T, et al. Anti-tachycardia Pacing Benefits Non-ischemic AND Ischemic Patients equally in the PainFreeSST trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(5);S590-S640.

4

Friedman P, Murgatroyd F, Boersma LVA, et al. Efficacy and safety of an extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(14):1292–1302. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206485.

5

Medtronic Aurora EV-ICDTM MRI SureScanTM DVEA3E4 Device Manual.

6

Thompson A. Lead extraction study. Medtronic data on file. November 2021.

7

Crozier I, et al. Primary Outcome Results from the Global Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (EV ICD) Pivotal Study. Late Breaking Clinical Trial Presentation at ESC 2022. August 28, 2022. Barcelona Spain.

8

Murgatroyd F, et al. Consistent ATP, defibrillation, and safety performance of the extravascular ICD: Final results from the global EV-ICD Pivotal Trial. LBCT oral presentation at ESC 2024. September 2, 2024. London, U.K.