Your browser is out of date

With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.

×

Skip to main content
Menu

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVi)

Medtronic key studies

Stay up to date on the latest clinical evidence from Medtronic. Key summaries demonstrate the efficacy of the CoreValve™/Evolut™ TAVI platform.

Download the Medtronic clinical trial overview brochure.

Expand All

SMART Trial 1-year results

SMART Trial 1-year results1

The SMall Annuli Randomized To Evolut or SAPIEN Trial, or SMART Trial, is a prospective, multi-center, international, randomized controlled trial comparing the Medtronic self-expandable (SE) Evolut™ system versus Edwards Lifesciences balloon-expandable (BE) SAPIEN™* transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) system in patients with a small aortic annulus (≤ 430 mm2) and symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis. These results emphasize the importance of valve design and its impact on performance.

Evolut™ TAVI delivers superior valve performance versus SAPIEN™* platform in small annulus patients with excellent early patient outcomes at 1 year.1

4x less

bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD)at 1 year vs. SAPIEN™* platform.‡ p < 0.001

Evolut™ TAVI: 9.4%
SAPIEN™* TAVI: 41.6%

Sample size

N = 716 total
N = 355 Evolut™ TAVI
N= 361 SAPIEN™* TAVI

Devices

Evolut™ PRO+ 78.0%
Evolut™ PRO 17.1%
Evolut™ FX 4.3%
Evolut™ R 0.6%

SAPIEN™* 3 Ultra 80.8%
SAPIEN™* 3 19.2%

Clinical outcome composite
All-cause mortality, disabling stroke, or heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year

Difference, -1.2% (90% CI -4.9%, 2.5%), p < 0.001 for noninferiority Hazard ratio, 0.90 (95% CI 0.56–1.43)

† Valve performance as defined as freedom from BVD at 12 months. BVD is a composite including any of the following: hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction (mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg), non-structural valve dysfunction (severe PPM or ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation), thrombosis, endocarditis, and aortic valve reintervention.

‡ In patients with small annuli (area ≤ 430 mm2) in all-comers trial, consisting of majority low surgical risk participants (52.1%).

TAVI risks may include, but are not limited to, death, stroke, damage to the arteries, bleeding, and need for permanent pacemaker.

Evolut™ Low Risk Trial

CoreValve™ and Evolut™ Pooled Analysis

Optimize PRO Interim Analysis

SURTAVI 5-year Trial

EXPAND TAVR II Pivotal Trial

Real-world results

Review recent data that reinforces the excellent outcomes seen in our Medtronic clinical trials.

Procedure and performance

Discover our procedural guidance and outcomes you can expect from the Evolut platform.

1. Herrmann HC, Mehran R, Blackman DJ, et al. Self-expanding or balloon-expandable TAVR in patients with a small aortic Annulus. N Engl J Med. Published online April 7, 2024. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312573.

2. Reardon M, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients at low surgical risk: 4-year outcomes from the Evolut low risk trial. Presented at TCT; 2023.

3. Yakubov S, et al. Five-year incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction in patients randomized to surgery or TAVR: insights from the CoreValve US Pivotal and SURTAVI Trials. Presented at CRT; 2023.

4. Grubb K. Impact of a standardized TAVI technique and care pathway in the Optimize PRO study. Presented at EuroPCR 2022; 2022; Paris, France.

5. Van Mieghem NM, Deeb GM, Søndergaard L, et al. Self-expanding transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: 5-year outcomes of the SURTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(10):1000–1008. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2695.

6. Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, et al. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(19):1825–1857. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038.

7. Capodanno D, Petronio AS, Prendergast B, et al. Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2017;38(45):3382–3390. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx303.

8. Adapted from VARC-3 Writing Committee, et al. and Capodanno D, et al.

9. Strange G, Stewart S, Celermajer D, et al. Poor Long-Term Survival in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. October 15, 2019;74(15);1851-1863

TM* Third party brands are trademarks of their respective owners. All other brands are trademarks of a Medtronic company.

DISCLAIMER

The material on this website should not be considered the exclusive source of information, it does not replace or supersede information contained in the device manual(s). Please note that the intended use of a product may vary depending on geographical approvals.

See the device manual(s) for detailed information regarding the intended use, the implant procedure, indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and potential adverse events.

For a MRI compatible device(s), consult the MRI information in the device manual(s) before performing a MRI. If a device is eligible for eIFU usage, instructions for use can be found at Medtronic’s website manuals.medtronic.com.

Manuals can be viewed using a current version of any major internet browser. For best results, use Adobe Acrobat® Reader with the browser.

Medtronic products placed on European markets bear the CE mark and the UKCA mark (if applicable). For any further information, contact your local Medtronic representative.

© 2024 Medtronic. All rights reserved, Medtronic, Medtronic logo and Further, Together are trademarks of Medtronic.

™*Third party brands are trademarks of their respective owners. All other brands are trademarks of a Medtronic company.