You just clicked a link to go to another website. If you continue, you may go to a site run by someone else.
We do not review or control the content on non-Medtronic sites, and we are not responsible for any business dealings or transactions you have there. Your use of the other site is subject to the terms of use and privacy statement on that site.
It is possible that some of the products on the other site are not approved in your region or country.
Your browser is out of date
With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.
The content of this website is exclusively reserved for Healthcare Professionals in countries with applicable health authority product registrations, except those practicing in France as some of the content is not in compliance with the French Advertising law N°2011-2012 dated 29th December 2011, article 34.
Click “OK” to confirm you are a Healthcare Professional.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVi)
Stay up to date on the latest clinical evidence from Medtronic. Key summaries demonstrate the efficacy of the CoreValve™/Evolut™ TAVI platform.
Download the Medtronic clinical trial overview brochure.
The SMall Annuli Randomized To Evolut or SAPIEN Trial, or SMART Trial, is a prospective, multi-center, international, randomized controlled trial comparing the Medtronic self-expandable (SE) Evolut™ system versus Edwards Lifesciences balloon-expandable (BE) SAPIEN™* transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) system in patients with a small aortic annulus (≤ 430 mm2) and symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis. These results emphasize the importance of valve design and its impact on performance.
4x less
bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD)† at 1 year vs. SAPIEN™* platform.‡ p < 0.001
Evolut™ TAVI: 9.4%
SAPIEN™* TAVI: 41.6%
N = 716 total
N = 355 Evolut™ TAVI
N= 361 SAPIEN™* TAVI
Evolut™ PRO+ 78.0%
Evolut™ PRO 17.1%
Evolut™ FX 4.3%
Evolut™ R 0.6%
SAPIEN™* 3 Ultra 80.8%
SAPIEN™* 3 19.2%
Clinical outcome composite
All-cause mortality, disabling stroke, or heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year
Difference, -1.2% (90% CI -4.9%, 2.5%), p < 0.001 for noninferiority Hazard ratio, 0.90 (95% CI 0.56–1.43)
† Valve performance as defined as freedom from BVD at 12 months. BVD is a composite including any of the following: hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction (mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg), non-structural valve dysfunction (severe PPM or ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation), thrombosis, endocarditis, and aortic valve reintervention.
‡ In patients with small annuli (area ≤ 430 mm2) in all-comers trial, consisting of majority low surgical risk participants (52.1%).
TAVI risks may include, but are not limited to, death, stroke, damage to the arteries, bleeding, and need for permanent pacemaker.
Evolut™ TAVI shows excellent outcomes in low-risk patients, with a 26% reduction in hazard for death or disabling stroke at 4 years.
N = 730 TAVI, N = 684 SAVR
Evolut™ R 73%/Evolut™ PRO 23.4%/CoreValve™ 3.6%
All-cause mortality or disabling stroke
CoreValve™/Evolut™ TAVI had significantly better valve performance than surgery as assessed by bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD),§ with 3x lower severe PPM in randomized clinical trials at 5 years (3.7% CoreValve™/Evolut™ TAVI versus 11.8% SAVR; p < 0.001).
CoreValve™/Evolut™ TAVI demonstrated significantly lower rates of BVD versus SAVR (7.8% CoreValve™/Evolut™ TAVI versus 14.2% SAVR; p < 0.001).
BVD out to 5 years
§ BVD was defined as6,7: SVD8 (mean gradient ≥ 10 mmHg increase from discharge/30 days AND ≥ 20 mmHg at last echo or new onset/increase of ≥ moderate intraprosthetic aortic regurgitation), NSVD (30-day severe PPM at 30-day/discharge3 or severe PVR through 5 years), clinical valve thrombosis, and endocarditis.
The cusp overlap technique, with an optimized care pathway, demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes in this interim analysis with single-digit pacemaker rates (9.8% PPI at 30 days), low rates of PVL (0% moderate/severe at discharge), and one-day median discharge from main cohort.
N = 400 patients in the main cohort. At the conclusion of the study, more than 650 patients will have been evaluated.
Evolut™ PRO+ 91.5%/Evolut™ PRO 8.0%
PVL (main cohort)
◊ One patient with mild-moderate PVL.
Compared to SAVR at 5 years, CoreValve™/Evolut™ TAVI demonstrated no statistical difference in all-cause mortality (30.0% TAVI versus 30.8% SAVR; p = 0.85), numerically lower disabling stroke (4.1% TAVI versus 5.8% SAVR; p = 0.12), and statistically better hemodynamics with stable low gradients in intermediate-risk patients.
N = 864 TAVI, N = 796 SAVR
CoreValve™ 84%/Evolut™ R 16%
Mean gradient and EOA over time implanted set
SURTAVI Five-year Data Highlight Video - (11:44)
Watch Dr. Popma sit down with Dr. Reardon and Prof. Van Mieghem to discuss SURTAVI five-year results and its impact on intermediate risk treatment decision-making and lifetime management.
More information (see more)
Less information (see less)
The purpose of the EXPAND TAVR II Pivotal Trial is to explore the treatment of moderate aortic stenosis (AS) with early transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) before AS becomes severe. Early treatment of AS may help preserve cardiac function, prevent or slow further deterioration in cardiac function, and prevent death in some patients.
Review recent data that reinforces the excellent outcomes seen in our Medtronic clinical trials.
Discover our procedural guidance and outcomes you can expect from the Evolut platform.
1. Herrmann HC, Mehran R, Blackman DJ, et al. Self-expanding or balloon-expandable TAVR in patients with a small aortic Annulus. N Engl J Med. Published online April 7, 2024. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312573.
2. Reardon M, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients at low surgical risk: 4-year outcomes from the Evolut low risk trial. Presented at TCT; 2023.
3. Yakubov S, et al. Five-year incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction in patients randomized to surgery or TAVR: insights from the CoreValve US Pivotal and SURTAVI Trials. Presented at CRT; 2023.
4. Grubb K. Impact of a standardized TAVI technique and care pathway in the Optimize PRO study. Presented at EuroPCR 2022; 2022; Paris, France.
5. Van Mieghem NM, Deeb GM, Søndergaard L, et al. Self-expanding transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: 5-year outcomes of the SURTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(10):1000–1008. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2695.
6. Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, et al. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(19):1825–1857. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038.
7. Capodanno D, Petronio AS, Prendergast B, et al. Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2017;38(45):3382–3390. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx303.
8. Adapted from VARC-3 Writing Committee, et al. and Capodanno D, et al.
9. Strange G, Stewart S, Celermajer D, et al. Poor Long-Term Survival in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. October 15, 2019;74(15);1851-1863
TM* Third party brands are trademarks of their respective owners. All other brands are trademarks of a Medtronic company.
DISCLAIMER
The material on this website should not be considered the exclusive source of information, it does not replace or supersede information contained in the device manual(s). Please note that the intended use of a product may vary depending on geographical approvals.
See the device manual(s) for detailed information regarding the intended use, the implant procedure, indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and potential adverse events.
For a MRI compatible device(s), consult the MRI information in the device manual(s) before performing a MRI. If a device is eligible for eIFU usage, instructions for use can be found at Medtronic’s website manuals.medtronic.com.
Manuals can be viewed using a current version of any major internet browser. For best results, use Adobe Acrobat® Reader with the browser.
Medtronic products placed on European markets bear the CE mark and the UKCA mark (if applicable). For any further information, contact your local Medtronic representative.
© 2024 Medtronic. All rights reserved, Medtronic, Medtronic logo and Further, Together are trademarks of Medtronic.
™*Third party brands are trademarks of their respective owners. All other brands are trademarks of a Medtronic company.