15 years of Mazor™ robotic guidance and 25 years of Stealth™ Navigation experience.
Mazor™ and AiBLE™ - The Digital Surgical Ecosystem. Discover what is possible
The strength of Mazor™.
Powered by automatic anatomy recognition, the enhanced 3D-planning software improves the complete construct design.
The power of Midas Rex™.
Midas Rex™ MR8™ High Speed Drill System is now fully integrated throughout your Mazor™ procedure offering controlled precision that speeds up to 75,000 RPM.
The confidence of access and interbody navigation.
Visualize with navigation the reach of disc preparation instruments and precise interbody placement without the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy.
Predictability of planning1,2
Planning is your foundation
Planning is your foundation. You can model and visualize your Screws, Intrabodies, Rods and simulate the final alignment to create a surgical Blueprint - all before you set foot in the OR.
See the devices manuals for detailed information regarding the instructions for use, indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and potential adverse events. For further information, contact your local Medtronic representative and/or consult the Medtronic website at medtronic.eu
The commercial name of Mazor™ is Mazor X Stealth™ Edition.
PAGE REFERENCES:
* Staff engagement is enhanced by not only decreasing psychological and physical cost but also offering more personal development opportunity2. By decreasing intra-operative fatigue and increasing piece of mind3-7, Surgical Synergy plays an essential role. It is reinforced by the training offering related to equipment.
1. Schroerlucke SR, Wang MY, Cannestra AF, et al. Complication Rate in Robotic-Guided vs Fluoro-Guided Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery: Report from MIS Refresh Prospective Comparative Study. Spine J, 2017; S254-S255 – abstract P176
2. Van Dijk JD, van den Ende RPJ, Stramigioli S, et al. Clinical Pedicle Screw Accuracy and Deviation From Planning in Robot-Guided Spine. Spine, 2015; 40: E986-E991
Campaign References
1
Hyun, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017; 42(6):353–358.
2
Van Dijk JD, van den Ende RPJ, Stramigioli S, et al. Clinical Pedicle Screw Accuracy and Deviation From Planning in Robot-Guided Spine. Spine, 2015;40: E986-E991.
3
Roser, et al. Neurosurgery, 2013; 72 (SUPPL. 1):A12–A18.
4
Lieberman, et al. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2012; 25(5): 241–248.
5
Fan, et al. Med Sci Monit, 2017; 23:5960-5968.