You just clicked a link to go to another website. If you continue, you may go to a site run by someone else.
We do not review or control the content on non-Medtronic sites, and we are not responsible for any business dealings or transactions you have there. Your use of the other site is subject to the terms of use and privacy statement on that site.
It is possible that some of the products on the other site are not approved in your region or country.
Your browser is out of date
With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.
The content of this website is exclusively reserved for Healthcare Professionals in countries with applicable health authority product registrations, except those practicing in France as some of the content is not in compliance with the French Advertising law N°2011-2012 dated 29th December 2011, article 34.
Click “OK” to confirm you are a Healthcare Professional.
HawkOne™ directional atherectomy system
The randomized DIRECT Trial1 demonstrated that lesions treated with the HawkOne™ Directional Atherectomy System had greater plaque volume reduction and luminal gain — with similar safety profiles — than those treated with the CSI Diamondback 360®* peripheral orbital atherectomy system. Results confirmed through IVUS and angiography.
There was a greater reduction in stenosis following directional atherectomy (DA) compared to orbital atherectomy (OA).
DA: 90.7% | OA: 87.3%
(p = 0.48)
DA: 39.5% | OA: 69.8%
(p < 0.001)
DA: 16.7% | OA: 33.7%
(p < 0.001)
69.2%
54.1%
5.6%
Mechanism of lumen enlargement: plaque reduction and vessel stretch
84.2%
74.8%
59.8%
Mechanism of lumen enlargement: medial dissection and vessel stretch
Greater plaque volume reduction was achieved with directional atherectomy group compared to orbital atherectomy group. This difference in plaque volume reduction persisted following drug-coated balloon (DCB) utilization.
DA: 81.8% | OA: 82.2%
(p = 0.8)
DA: 66.5% | OA: 75.6%
(p = 0.0002)
DA: 54.5% | OA: 61.3%
(p = 0.003)
DA: 68.3% | OA: 69.0%
(p = 0.43)
DA: 61.4% | OA: 67.0%
(p = 0.06)
DA: 53.2% | OA: 56.7%
(p = 0.01)
(p = 0.02)
Overall directional and orbital atherectomy were found to be safe with minimal complications.
Results may not be indicative of clinical performance, and are dependent on experience and training. The DIRECT study was an investigator-initiated study supported by an institutional grant from Medtronic. Three-year follow-up is ongoing to determine whether these acute performance measures are associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Risks may include but are not limited to: arterial perforation, embolism or arterial thrombosis, arterial dissection, arterial spasm, and vascular complications that could require surgical repair.
From simple to complex cases, the HawkOne directional atherectomy system offers the versatility and efficiency physicians need to remove plaque and restore flow.
Download this clinical paper review to learn more about DIRECT study results.
183KB
™Third-party brands are trademarks of their respective owners.
Values are expressed as median (interquartile range).
Babaev A, Halista M, Bakirova Z, et al. Directional versus orbital atherectomy of femoropopliteal artery lesions: Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. October 2022;100(4);687–695.