Image of nurse looking at computer screen with CareLink

Remote MONITORING

Provide closer care to your patients wherever they are

WHY REMOTE MONITORING

In today’s increasingly complex environment, device clinics are finding ways to improve patient outcomes, while efficiently managing resources.

CareLink™ remote monitoring helps clinics overcome these challenges by moving data instead of patients and enabling early notifications of important events. 

HOW IT WORKS

RemoteManagement infograph

REMOTE MONITORING MEANS THAT YOU ARE NOT IN THE DARK BETWEEN IN-CLINIC CHECKS

Blue Clock Icon


Early CareAlert™ notifications of clinically important events help you react quicker to improve patient outcomes.

 

Remote management boxes

THE BENEFITS

MOVE DATA, NOT PATIENTS

Icon graph


More than 2 million patients around the world are followed up on Medtronic Carelink™7. That translates to up to 3.4 million less patient visits every year8.

Patient Management Medtronic - Remote Check Data Infographic

CARELINK™ NETWORK

Leading remote monitoring system, with 99.9% of Medtronic devices compatible with the network.15

CareLink Network computer screen

MONITORING SOLUTIONS

A personalised solution for every patient.

Monitoring Solutions for Patient Management

References

1

Gimbel, 2012. Heart Rhythm, vol 9, no 12.

2

Slotwiner D. et al. HRS expert consensus statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:e69–100.

3

Landolina M et al. Remote monitoring reduces healthcare use and improves quality of care in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators: the evolution of management strategies of heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators (EVOLVO). Circulation. 2012 Jun 19;125(24):2985-92.

4

De Simone A et al. Remote monitoring improves outcome after ICD implantation: the clinical efficacy in the management of heart failure (EFFECT) study. Europace. 2015.

5

Portugal G et al. Influence of remote monitoring on long-term cardiovascular outcomes after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2016;222:764-8.

6

Bogyi P et al. Association of Remote Monitoring With Survival in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing CRT Therapy. J Med Internet Res 2019;21(7):e14142

7

CareLink Statistics. December, 2020. Medtronic Data on File.

8

In-person visit reduction estimation based on published metrics in literature & follow-up guidelines. December, 2020. Medtronic Data on File

9

Boriani G et al. Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016.

10

Calo L et al. Economic impact of remote monitoring on ordinary follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators as compared with conventional in-hospital visits. A single-center prospective and randomized study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013;37(1):69-78.

11

Cronin E, et al. Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Devices: A Time and Activity Analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1947-1951.

12

Raatikainen MJ, et al. Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients: A Safe, Time-Saving, and Cost-Effective Means for Follow-up. Europace. 2008;10:1145-1151.

13

Dario C et al. Large controlled observational study on remote monitoring of pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators: a clinical, economic, and organizational evaluation. Interact J Med Res. 2016;5(1):e4.

14

Piccini JP et al. Impact of remote monitoring on clinical events and associated health care utilization: A nationwide assessment. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(12):2279-2286.

15

Devices supported on the CareLink™ Network. January 2014. Medtronic Data on File.