You just clicked a link to go to another website. If you continue, you may go to a site run by someone else.
It is possible that some of the products on the other site are not approved in your region or country.
Your browser is out of date
With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.
The content of this website is exclusively reserved for Healthcare Professionals in countries with applicable health authority product registrations, except those practicing in France as some of the content is not in compliance with the French Advertising law N°2011-2012 dated 29th December 2011, article 34.
Click “OK” to confirm you are a Healthcare Professional.
Learn how your teams can improve the efficiency of your AF ablation procedures and workflows.WATCH THE VIDEOS
The FIRE AND ICE trial demonstrated that when compared to point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) ablation, Cryoballoon ablation is associated with 33% fewer repeat ablations, 21% fewer cardiovascular hospitalisations, and 50% fewer cardioversions.2See the Results
Find additional feature information along with a variety of educational resources and tools.VISIT MEDTRONIC ACADEMY
Metzner A, et al. electrophysiology lab efficiency comparison between cryoballoon and point-by-point RF ablation: a German sub-analysis of the FReeze Cohort Study. DGK 88th Annual Conference April 2022. Clinical Research in Cardiology (2022) 111:592. https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2022/abstracts/aV1041.html?q=freeze
Kuck KH et al. Cryoballoon on radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality of life outcome in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(38):2858-2865