You just clicked a link to go to another website. If you continue, you may go to a site run by someone else.
We do not review or control the content on non-Medtronic sites, and we are not responsible for any business dealings or transactions you have there. Your use of the other site is subject to the terms of use and privacy statement on that site.
It is possible that some of the products on the other site are not approved in your region or country.
Your browser is out of date
With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.
The content of this website is exclusively reserved for Healthcare Professionals in countries with applicable health authority product registrations, except those practicing in France as some of the content is not in compliance with the French Advertising law N°2011-2012 dated 29th December 2011, article 34.
Click “OK” to confirm you are a Healthcare Professional.
1STOP (One Shot to PVI) is a large-scale, real-world data initiative capturing clinical insights from over 8'500 patients across more than 47 hospitals in Italy. It focuses on patients undergoing cardiac ablation using Medtronic’s Cardiac Ablation Solutions, including the Arctic Front™ family of cryoablation catheters and, more recently, the PulseSelect™ pulsed field ablation (PFA) system, and the Affera™ Mapping and Ablation system.
The initiative is designed to improve patient outcomes by collecting, managing, analyzing, and reporting treatment data - sometimes supported through the dedicated patient app, MyCryo App. To date, 1STOP has supported over 20 scientific publications, exploring key topics such as:
Molon et al. 2025, Journal of Interventional Cardiac
Use of the PulseSelect PFA system in treating paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) demonstrated short procedural times, a rapid learning curve, high acute procedural efficiency, and a favourable safety profile with no major complications observed. General anaesthesia was not needed in approximately one out of four cases.
Manfrin et al., 2022, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, (No = 429)
Usage of the fourth generation Arctic Front cryoballon family™ increased the rate of acute PVI recording capability and resulted in a higher rate of long-term PVI success, as demonstrated by the reduced rate of AF recurrence in comparison to the 2nd generation cohort at the 12-month follow-up period.
Iacopino et al., 2019, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, (No = 480)
The Arctic Front cryoballon family™ achieved significantly faster procedural ablation times in comparison to the previous generations, while still maintaining a low rate of acute complications. Also, the rate of TTI visualization was observed to be higher with the last catheter’s generation.
Rordorf et al. 2022, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, (No = 3313)
A CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 is an independent predictor of AF recurrence during the follow-up and should be considered during the clinical management after the index procedure.
Bertaglia et al., 2022, Clinical Cardiology, (No = 1318)
Arctic Front cryoballon family™ had similar efficacy and safety in young and middle-aged patients. Younger age did not affect acute procedural results, complication rate, or AF recurrence after a single procedure.
Boriani et al. Chronic Kidney Disease Journal of Cardiovasc Development & Disease, April 2022, (No = 1971)
A multicenter analysis of AF patients treated with cryoablation revealed mild to moderate reductions in renal functions were associated with a higher risk of AF recurrences; conversely, the procedural success and complication rates were similar in patients with normal, mildly reduced, or mild to moderate renal functions.
Sciarra et al., 2021, Cardiology Research & Practice (No = 2534)
Procedural performance indicators and complications were similar between different ages; AF recurrences seem to be more frequent in patients over 74 years.
Malaspina et al. 2020, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (No = 2048)
Arctic Front cryoballon family™ in obese patients is a safe procedure. Increased BMI (either moderate or severe) was not associated with a worse outcome or to a different rate of AAD discontinuation at 12 months.
Perego et al., 2020, Heart, Lung & Circ, (No = 1200)
The acute success and recurrence rate after a single procedure was not related to the presence of Structural Heart DiseaseSHD or to the degree of cardiac remodeling.
Ricciardi et al., 2019, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, (No= 2300)
Arctic Front cryoballon family™ procedure is safe regardless of the patient’s sex; however, when considering efficacy of the procedure, female patients had a lower long-term efficacy in comparison to males. These results should not discourage women from catheter ablation for the treatment of AF, but instead, the findings should encourage women to proactively seek treatment for AF earlier in the manifestation of the disease.
Perego et al., 2019, Journal of Cardiology, (No = 460)
The arrhythmia recurrence after a single procedure was not related to either the degree of cardiac structural remodeling or the type of AF, and the rate of AF recurrence was lower than previously reported in patients with Structural Heart Disease in other cohort series using focal radiofrequency catheter ablation.
Stabile et al., 2023, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, (No = 3205)
Time from first symptomatic AF episode of >18 months was a significant predictor of AF recurrence after Arctic Front cryoballon family™ Pulmonary Vein isolation.
Stabile et al. 2020, Europace EP (No = 3681)
In patients undergoing Arctic Front cryoballon family™ ablation for AF, early recurrences of atrial fibrillation are rare and are a strong predictor of AF recurrence in the follow-up, above all when they occur >30 days after the ablation.
Arena et al., 2018, Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (N= 510)
Reducing the time between diagnosis and ablation brought about a treatment that had a lower risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence with no change in safety.
Moltrasio et al., 2021, Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, (No = 249)
Arctic Front cryoballon family™ with a PVI strategy can be used to treat patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation with good acute procedural success, short procedure times, and acceptable safety.
Verlato et al., 2020, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, (No = 474)
Alternation of energy source for repeat ablation was safe and effective, regardless of the energy used first. Patients initially treated with Arctic Front cryoballon family™ PVI ablation undergoing repeat ablation with radiofrequency (RF) had less AF recurrence at long-term follow-up as compared with those originally treated by RF ablation receiving a cryoablation repeat ablation.
Tondo et al, 2018, Heart Rhythm, (N= 486)
The PVI procedure was safe, effective, and efficient with regard to the treatment of patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF.
Molon et al., 2023, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, (No = 865)
The use of a web App to record AF-related symptoms was feasible and effective. Additionally, a bad health status reporting in the App was associated with AF recurrence during follow-up.
Landolina et al., 2018, International Journal of Cardiology, (No = 860)
The long-term freedom from AF recurrence was not influenced by the amount of operator experience.
Padeletti et al., 2017, PACE, (N= 903)
Arctic Front cryoballon family™ showed an excellent safety profile when performed in a large real-world clinical setting, with satisfactory acute success rate and, on average, short procedural times.
Sagone et al., 2019, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, (No = 912)
Pulmonary vein isolation by cryoablation was effective regardless of the availability of imaging data on PV anatomy.
Stabile et al., 2018, International Journal of Cardiology, (No = 1042)
In about two thirds of patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation it was not possible to acutely assess time to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in all PVs. However, one-year freedom from clinically symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia was similar to that of patients in which time to PV isolation was documented in all targeted veins.
The data is owned by the hospital centers and is processed by Medtronic in accordance with current regulations on data processing in pseudonymized form to enable the provision of the service.
DISCLAIMER
The material on this website should not be considered the exclusive source of information, it does not replace or supersede information contained in the device manual(s). Please note that the intended use of a product may vary depending on geographical approvals.
See the device manual(s) for detailed information regarding the intended use, the implant procedure, indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and potential adverse events.
For a MRI compatible device(s), consult the MRI information in the device manual(s) before performing a MRI. If a device is eligible for eIFU usage, instructions for use can be found at Medtronic’s website manuals.medtronic.com.
Manuals can be viewed using a current version of any major internet browser. For best results, use Adobe Acrobat® Reader with the browser.
Medtronic products placed on European markets bear the CE mark and the UKCA mark (if applicable). For any further information, contact your local Medtronic representative.